<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Just Jeremy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.bicha.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net</link>
	<description>just my thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:58:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Tobias</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eh, nevermind, sorry. I’m merely upset when it’s not functional. Gnome-panel didn’t work properly because things like nm-applet only worked with indicators, but indicators were not available because they remained unported. So it looked pretty degraded from before.

Now Gnome 3 is partly up-to-date and partly 6+ months old and some things don’t work properly, e.g., media-keys.

The delta is just getting bigger and bigger and I often don’t see the point. It’s not modular anymore when there are intrusive patches everywhere that co-depend. For instance, I looked at gnome-control-center today with it’s 30 or so patches. Why does it need category headers and an additional top-level of icons. It’s pointless. It never gets upstreamed and widens the gap between up and downstream, technically and socially.

I’m thankful for Gnome3 PPA and ricotz/testing, because those give a hint of vanilla flavor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, nevermind, sorry. I’m merely upset when it’s not functional. Gnome-panel didn’t work properly because things like nm-applet only worked with indicators, but indicators were not available because they remained unported. So it looked pretty degraded from before.</p>
<p>Now Gnome 3 is partly up-to-date and partly 6+ months old and some things don’t work properly, e.g., media-keys.</p>
<p>The delta is just getting bigger and bigger and I often don’t see the point. It’s not modular anymore when there are intrusive patches everywhere that co-depend. For instance, I looked at gnome-control-center today with it’s 30 or so patches. Why does it need category headers and an additional top-level of icons. It’s pointless. It never gets upstreamed and widens the gap between up and downstream, technically and socially.</p>
<p>I’m thankful for Gnome3 PPA and ricotz/testing, because those give a hint of vanilla flavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Jeremy Bicha</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bicha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, it&#039;s just software, no need to get this angry over it.

How is GNOME Shell on Ubuntu degraded? Ubuntu doesn&#039;t really patch GNOME Shell.

Last cycle, we shipped gnome-panel without Ubuntu customization patches and it was pretty awful. The default notification area just isn&#039;t adequate. I don&#039;t understand how you can be upset at the indicators not being including for GNOME Classic and upset at Ubuntu modifying vanilla GNOME.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it&#8217;s just software, no need to get this angry over it.</p>
<p>How is GNOME Shell on Ubuntu degraded? Ubuntu doesn&#8217;t really patch GNOME Shell.</p>
<p>Last cycle, we shipped gnome-panel without Ubuntu customization patches and it was pretty awful. The default notification area just isn&#8217;t adequate. I don&#8217;t understand how you can be upset at the indicators not being including for GNOME Classic and upset at Ubuntu modifying vanilla GNOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Tobias</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too *BLEEP* late. Ted Gould dropped the ball. Fallback session had been non-functional for one and a half releases because of this. 

I’m using Gnome Shell now. Unfortunately also that is degraded in many respects due to the oftentimes uninspired and counter-productive Ubuntu customization and theming and cruftization patches, which are so numerous that important packages like gnome-control-center are held back on 6 months old versions.

Whatever happened to the stracciatella idea? It means vanilla Gnome with just the absolutely necessary Ubuntu chocolate sprinkles. Not this gratuitous ladling on of pointless high-calorie branding sauce.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too *BLEEP* late. Ted Gould dropped the ball. Fallback session had been non-functional for one and a half releases because of this. </p>
<p>I’m using Gnome Shell now. Unfortunately also that is degraded in many respects due to the oftentimes uninspired and counter-productive Ubuntu customization and theming and cruftization patches, which are so numerous that important packages like gnome-control-center are held back on 6 months old versions.</p>
<p>Whatever happened to the stracciatella idea? It means vanilla Gnome with just the absolutely necessary Ubuntu chocolate sprinkles. Not this gratuitous ladling on of pointless high-calorie branding sauce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Jo-Erlend Schinstad</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo-Erlend Schinstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just tested it, and it&#039;s really coming along. It works much better with Radiance than Ambiance, though there&#039;s still a noticable difference with the indicator applets background. A bigger problem with Ambiance is that the text on the switcher is almost unreadable. With Radience, everything works well. It just looks slightly unpolished. 

Perhaps it would be a good idea to start an Experience Team for this effort?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tested it, and it&#8217;s really coming along. It works much better with Radiance than Ambiance, though there&#8217;s still a noticable difference with the indicator applets background. A bigger problem with Ambiance is that the text on the switcher is almost unreadable. With Radience, everything works well. It just looks slightly unpolished. </p>
<p>Perhaps it would be a good idea to start an Experience Team for this effort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Jeremy Bicha</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bicha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indicator support for GNOME panel 3 finally landed a few days ago, so that part is new. I ran gnome-panel in Precise most of the weekend without crashes so I&#039;m not sure what wasn&#039;t working for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indicator support for GNOME panel 3 finally landed a few days ago, so that part is new. I ran gnome-panel in Precise most of the weekend without crashes so I&#8217;m not sure what wasn&#8217;t working for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Benjamin Kerensa</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Kerensa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could be totally wrong but this isn&#039;t a new development is it? I asked if he would transition it over for Precise a few months ago? :P

gnome-panel has been failwhaling lately though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be totally wrong but this isn&#8217;t a new development is it? I asked if he would transition it over for Precise a few months ago? <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>gnome-panel has been failwhaling lately though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Ubuntu clássico agora com suporte a indicadores « Ubuntu-BR-SC</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ubuntu clássico agora com suporte a indicadores « Ubuntu-BR-SC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gould, possibilitou que os indicadores fossem portados para o gnome-panel 3. Com isso, de acordo Jeremy Bicha, membro do time do Ubuntu Desktop, foi possível atualizar o visual do gnome-panel, substituindo a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gould, possibilitou que os indicadores fossem portados para o gnome-panel 3. Com isso, de acordo Jeremy Bicha, membro do time do Ubuntu Desktop, foi possível atualizar o visual do gnome-panel, substituindo a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Jeremy Bicha</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bicha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gnome-session-fallback depends on gnome-panel and gnome-panel depends on gnome-session-fallback. If you have installed one, you&#039;ll automatically have the other one. The version number of gnome-panel is the important one as &quot;GNOME Classic&quot; is basically gnome-panel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gnome-session-fallback depends on gnome-panel and gnome-panel depends on gnome-session-fallback. If you have installed one, you&#8217;ll automatically have the other one. The version number of gnome-panel is the important one as &#8220;GNOME Classic&#8221; is basically gnome-panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by bruno revel</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bruno revel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***  Install either gnome-panel or gnome-fallback-session (they both install the same thing in Ubuntu). ****

as i see: gnome-panel is 3.3.5 but gnome-session-fallback is stuck at 3.2.1 only

so g-s-f have not been updated yet, i am right ?
My system use g-s-f as i&#039;m logged as gnome-classic (no compiz/unity), but the two packages are installed; As you said &quot;installed either&quot; does it mean that only g-s-f should be installed ? I does not find comments in synaptic dependencies about possible conflict with gnome-panel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***  Install either gnome-panel or gnome-fallback-session (they both install the same thing in Ubuntu). ****</p>
<p>as i see: gnome-panel is 3.3.5 but gnome-session-fallback is stuck at 3.2.1 only</p>
<p>so g-s-f have not been updated yet, i am right ?<br />
My system use g-s-f as i&#8217;m logged as gnome-classic (no compiz/unity), but the two packages are installed; As you said &#8220;installed either&#8221; does it mean that only g-s-f should be installed ? I does not find comments in synaptic dependencies about possible conflict with gnome-panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Classic, Now With Indicators by Jeremy Bicha</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.bicha.net/2012/02/11/ubuntu-classic-now-with-indicators/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bicha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.bicha.net/?p=172#comment-258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#039;s in the Software Center. Install either gnome-panel or gnome-fallback-session (they both install the same thing in Ubuntu).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s in the Software Center. Install either gnome-panel or gnome-fallback-session (they both install the same thing in Ubuntu).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

